Back to School; Simulations and Laser Crystals

February 22nd, 2012

UCFIt had been almost as decade  since I looked this way in 1970; now it was late 1979. I had interrupted my pursuit for a Physics degree to try to get into business constructing and selling hypercube loudspeakers. When our trip to NY didn’t turn out as well as we had hoped, we were broke again; the corporation more or less went dormant, waiting for the eventual issuance of the patent which happened 12 months later in Nov 4, 1980 as Reagan was being elected President.
.
.

.
.
.
UCFI returned to school by entering the University of Central Florida in Orlando (UCF) majoring in Physics. On the way to my BS Physics degree I was gluttonous and took electives like Medical Physics, Numerical Integration Methods (Physics simulations using FORTRAN to calculate trajectories and orbits), Quantum Physics, The Physics of Science Fiction, Electronics, and Laser Physics (a Graduate-level course using Amnon Yariv’s Quantum Electronics as the text).
.
The FORTRAN simulations turned out to be fun once I discovered that I didn’t have to punch a deck of Hollerith cards. There were a small number of terminals accessing the university computer which allowed FORTRAN files to be entered at video terminals line by line and then executed to generate output. This was more fun than punching cards to make a program.
.
But the coolest course was the graduate level course in Laser Physics. I learned for the first time that crystals have arcane uses in laser optics. For example, there are the ’simple’ frequency doubling crystals, which under the proper conditions can change red input laser light into blue output light. Then there are the Magneto-Optic effect crystals, which can use an applied magnetic field to rotate the axis of polarization of the laser beam passing through it. The ability to manipulate the polarization of the laser photons, in combination with an external polarizer, enables the beam to be modulated by magneto-optically varying the angle between the beam polarization and the external polarizer. This turns out to have important applications in fiber optic data transmission and Bell’s hypothesis quantum inseparability experiments.

On 11/4/1980 we received U.S. patent #4,231,446. On 12/19/1981 I received my bachelor’s degree.

– MRK

Twitter del.icio.us Digg Facebook linked-in Yahoo Buzz StumbleUpon

Driving to Manhattan; the Need for Validation

February 20th, 2012

Tesserax logo stickerOur story thus far:

A funny thing happened to me on the way to my Bachelor’s degree. I had spent my first two years as an Engineering Physics major at the United States Naval Academy, seemingly trying to turn myself into another copy of my career-Navy father. When I decided my path lay elsewhere, I resigned and entered the University of Florida at Gainesville, majoring in Physics. It was there that I met up with Tom and Rob Weiss, whom I had known back at Crystal River High School. After catching up and endless discussion about hyperspace and hypercubes, I decided to make a cardboard model. But I put it together inside out, producing a shape neither of us had ever seen before. Tom made better models than mine and we found they they resonated amazingly strongly to all the music we were listening to. When Summer break came and my brother James and I went off to Orlando to earn a little money as graveyard shift janitors (”Custodial Hosts” in Disney-speak), Tom went home and told his father he had found a great shape for loudspeaker cabinets. His father was dubious, so Tom scraped off some of his paintings, cut out pieces, and made the first functioning Hypercube speaker. it worked even better than he had hoped, and we applied for a U.S. utility patent and began making plans to build and sell this great new technology. At first we tried using a radial arm saw, then we decided it would be more practical to get cabinet makers to cut the pieces for us.

In the Spring of 1979 Tesserax was in communication with an advertising corporation named, I believe, Omnimedia (I do not know if they still exist.) We were still wondering how we could make a splash in the market and get the technology the attention it deserved without detailed test reports. We had vague ideas about them making an infomercial or something for us. And then one day we were reading Stereo Review magazine, and had an idea that might work. If we could get our speakers reviewed by the prestigious Julian Hirsch of Hirsch-Houk Laboratories, well known for independent audio equipment testing, that could be our big break that would finally get us some traction in the marketplace. Through Omnimedia, we got in touch with Larry Klein, the Technical Editor, and from our conversations it appeared that if we got some hypercube speakers to Stereo Review’s office in New York, NY he would give them a listen and forward them to Hirsch-Houk Labs for serious testing and review.

hypercube speakerThe speakers we had been trying to sell up to that point were car speakers, but we wanted SR to see something more substantial. So we decided to go all out and design a new speaker model. This time we would even make a custom grille mounting. Normally, loudspeaker are rectangular boxes and the woofers are protected by a rectangle of acoustically transparent foam or just grille cloth. We had no time to learn how to mold acoustically transparent foam so we went with grille cloth stretched over a wooden frame.

3D speaker grilleIn another flash of brilliance, Tom suggested that since ordinary speakers have square or rectangular 2D grilles, our hypercube speakers should have 3D grilles. That way the grille would be one dimension higher than the usual too. It would be a hypercube speaker with a seemingly cubical grille.

And so it was. The grilles for these speakers would be a labor of love and an exercise in solid geometry. I didn’t make them, but they were made.

uncovered speaker Our car speakers had employed a single 4 inch cone driver from Pioneer. For small speakers, a single cone means no crossover needed and simple mounting. For Stereo Review, however, we would need more. Using my father’s VISA card we ordered the large woofers, cone midranges, and horn tweeters from SpeakerLab in Seattle. We went with the triangular truncation baffle plate and mounted the midrange (with its own separate hypercube sub-enclosure inside the main cabinet) and horn tweeter on the adjacent panels.

After the pieces for the cabinet we assembled, stained, and oiled we had to get them to the Big Apple. But who would we entrust them to? We would get only one shot at this; if damaged loudspeakers arrived in new York we would look incompetent.

We decided to deliver them ourselves. So Tom, his father, and me carefully boxed them up and placed them in a van. We drove that van from our warehouse-factory all the way from Florida to NY. We carried them in personally, got back in the van, and drove home to Florida, full of hope that we would finally get attention.

broken speakerWeeks passed with no word. Finally we received word to pick up our speakers at the airport. When we opened the boxes, we were aghast. The baffle plates were cracked and the woofers, wider than the holes they had been mounted on, were somehow inside the cabinets lying on the bottom but still connected by wires. When we contacted Stereo Review for an update, we were told that they were “okay speakers” but that there would be no test report or review.

When we asked how the speakers had become damaged, we were first told that they had arrived damaged. When we protested that we had personally delivered them to their offices, our contact speculated that the damage must have resulted from some jolt that happened when the plane landed at Tampa.

A suspicious person might speculate that the woofers had been pried off the cabinets to learn what was inside to make them so good. Since we had attached the woofer with a strong bead of silicone rubber, attempting to pry off the woofers would have cracked the baffle plates; the wood was considerably thinner than the 1/2 - 1″ thick particle board usually used by speaker makers.

It is also possible that rough handling by loaders or an unusually hard landing just might have caused the damage; the woofers were heavy. But not having been there when it happened, we will never know exactly what happened. In any event, it was over. Stereo Review had decided that we weren’t worth the trouble.

The pictures you see in this post were taken today, 2/20/2012. The speakers are still in my parents’ living room here in Crystal River, FL. I have left them unchanged since 1979 to remind me of the importance of safe packaging.

Next: Back to School; Numerical Integration = Simulation

–MRK

Twitter del.icio.us Digg Facebook linked-in Yahoo Buzz StumbleUpon

Of Möbius strips and Klein bottles; a Brief Digression

February 16th, 2012

Klein bottleAnd now for something slightly different. For w while now I have obsessed on rectilinear geometry. When I think of measuring area, 3-volume, or 4-volume I think of square feet, cubic feet and hypercubic feet, so when I think of hypersolids, surfaces in 3+ space, I think of hypercubes with straight lines and sharp edges.
.
.

The rectilinear surfaces are comforting because their simple symmetry and orientability result from their straight lines.

But there are more geometries than simple  Cartesian or Spherical geometry. We have yet to speak of the non-orientable surfaces.

mobius strip

This is the a simple diagram showing the orientation problem of the Möbius strip when it is embedded in 3D space.
(from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/MoebiusStrip.html). You can make one with a strip of paper and a piece of tape by twisting the ends of the paper before you tape them together.

At first it might seem there is no problem; every single point on the surface of the Möbius strip is a point in the 3-dimensional space shown by the transparent box around the surface. If it’s all inside the box, what is the problem with orienting it?

Look at the Möbius strip again and imagine you are a person standing on it at the point between the ends of the red lines. Your head is pointing up in the 3-space, that is, along the +z axis.

Now walk down the center line of the strip in either direction. The road will curve, but if there is gravity holding you to the road you can keep walking around the strip. If you do, you will be surprised to discover that after one time around you are not back where you started. Your feet are still glued to the surface of the strip, but you are on the “other side” of it — your head is now pointing down instead of up, along the -z axis.

If you keep going in the same direction one more time around, after 2 times around you will be back where you started, exactly.

The disturbing thing about this it that this means the Möbius strip only has one side. This means that there are two different opposite directions for the normal to the surface at every point, making geometrically valid orientation problematical. Also surface integrals tend to cancel themselves out, which makes analysis frustrating.

The Möbius strip is an example of a twisted embedding. It is a 2-D object (the original rectangular strip of paper) that has had its “ends” twisted with respect to each other and then fastened to make the two sides into one side. There is also only one edge or 1-surface.

Klein bottleI like to symbolize this as   2  @ 3 –> 1 surface.

The next higher version of a twisted embedding is 3  @  4  –> 2. it is a 3-D object that has had its “ends” twisted with respect to each other in 4-space and attached to make a surface which joins the inside and the outside into one continuous 3-surface with one 2-surface edge or border to it. This surface is called a Klein bottle. (from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/KleinBottle.html )

.

It is hard to see in this graphic image, but if you go inside the Klein bottle and follow the tube around you find yourself walking on the  outside until you go around another 360 degrees again. As before, this is a non-orientable surface because of the double contradictory (antiparallel) normal vectors; there is only one surface (only one side to this object), and you can be standing on it with your head pointing “inward” or “outward” and change from one to the other merely by walking around on the surface.

–MRK

Twitter del.icio.us Digg Facebook linked-in Yahoo Buzz StumbleUpon

Blue Skies and Radial Arm Saws

February 16th, 2012

hypercube The teeth that do not smile bite through
to leave their mark upon the cloven wood.
And scorch in haste what Time had grown in years
to carve a dozen capstones.
— MRK
.
In 1978 the first attempt to mass-manufacture hypercubes began with the purchase of a Sears Craftsman 12 inch radial arm saw. For those who do not know, this is a tool that consists of a sturdy table and a powerful saw that is mounted on an arm that can be swung parallel to the ground and set to desired angles and bevels.

By different angles, I mean that you can cut at, say, 109.5 degrees or 70.5 degrees instead of 90. By different bevels I mean the saw drive axis can be tilted with respect to the vertical so that you can cut at 30 degrees to the vertical and leave 60 degrees edge on the wood so that two pieces can come together at 120 degrees instead of 90.

There are many kinds of numbers. There are natural counting numbers like 1,2,3… that we use to describe quantities of units such a people or cans of orange juice. There are rational numbers such .250 or 98.6 that lie between the counting numbers (or integers) but are still recognizable as quantities.

And then there are the irrational numbers such a pi and the square root of 3.  These cannot be expressed as finite ratios, yet they are finite numbers. That is, they are finite numbers with an infinite number of decimal places. We know that pi is between three and four. We write it as 3.14159… to indicate that the numbers in it go on forever but are known to express a number larger than 3.14 units and smaller than 3.15 units. Functionally, we could say that pi is the circumference of a sphere or cylinder with a diameter of one unit. In other words, a ball with a radius of 1/2 and a diameter of 1.0 foot has a circumference of 3.14159… feet.

Irrational numbers come up a lot in geometry. The diagonal of a unit square is the square root of 2. The diagonal of a unit cube is the square root of 3. How do we know this? Because a Greek geometer named Pythagoras discovered that if A, B, and C are the lengths of the sides of a right triangle (that is, a triangle that contains a 90 degree angle), and C is the longest side (or hypotenuse), then A2 + B2 = C2 so if you have a 45, 45, 90 triangle such as you get by slicing a square along its diagonal, you have 1 + 1 = C2 or C is the square root of 2.

rhombic dodecahedronWant to make a rhombic dodecahedron? Each of the 12 rhombi that make up the RD is like a square that someone sat on. It has four identical length sides but they are not at 90 degrees. Two of the angles are less than 90 and two are more. But how much more and how much less?

The RD rhombus can be made by putting 4 identical triangles together. They are right triangles and their short sides are A = 1/2 and B = (the square root of 2) / 2.
By the Pythagorean equation we have 1/4 + 2/4 = C2 so we get
C2 = 3/4, or C = (the square root of 3) divided by 2.

Therefore, if we derive the rhombic dodecahedron by turning a 1 x 1 x 1 unit cube inside out all of the 24 edges of the RD are (square root of 3)/2 or approximately .866 units long.

If you have a radial arm saw, you can make rhombi easily.
(1) set the bevel to 30 degrees
(2) set the saw to rip out planks with parallel long sides
(3) set the arm angle to 70.5 degrees at the same bevel and slice across the planks diagonally. Measure the length of the cut edge so that you can cut rhombi with all four sides the same length as this cut edge
(4) keeping the bevel inward (so that each rhombus is like the capstone of an arch on all 4 edges) slice out rhombi from the plank.

If you do this properly, you will make rhombi with 70.5 and 109.5 degree angles and an inward bevel of 30o meaning that 60o of the wood is left and the pieces will come together with a dihedral angle of 120o instead of 90.

This is not the only way or the best way to make rhombic dodecahedra, but it is about the best you can do with the limited accuracy of a radial arm saw. Naturally, the more precisely the material is cut, the easier it is to make all of the pieces fit together. I am not trying to be cruel when I say that more than one experienced cabinet maker has attempted to perfect the process. I do not claim to be a craftsman or even a carpenter. But I do know the correct angles are irrational numbers that cannot ever be reproduced exactly, any more then you can cut a piece of wood exactly pi units long.

This is what we did ourselves, at first. We knew we needed demonstration hypercubes to show people that it could be done. So at first we used the radial arm saw to rip the planks and cut out the rhombi. We made several enclosures this way, but realized quickly that it would be a problem to cut all of the pieces we would need for regular production runs once we were in the business of cranking out hypercube speaker cabinets.

So we found a cabinet maker and explained our needs. In due time he presented us with a box of pieces that did not quite fit together. We grimaced and put them together anyway , sanding as necessary to get the edges to meet etc. while he improved the process and refined his cutting jigs.

At this time we were both essentially college dropouts trying to get into business on a shoestring. We had applied for a patent, so that now we could in good faith put “patent pending” on our business cards and packaging.

Next: Driving to Manhattan; the Need for Validation

–MRK

Twitter del.icio.us Digg Facebook linked-in Yahoo Buzz StumbleUpon

Love’s Labors Lost; How I Spent My Summer Vacation

February 11th, 2012

me in 2000And here resumes the tale of how it wove.
When dreams obsessive haunt the questing mind
and darkling, daunt the reach to find
a chance to carve our names upon the Tree –
for those who will come after, strive to Be.

— MRK
.
After I had survived three Quarters at UF my parents decided I needed to take a little break and wake up and smell the Styrofoam coffee. In other words, I was encouraged to try working for a living.

They were concerned about me, no doubt. I had few friends, no job, no plan. Although I had been continuing my college education majoring in Physics, the only significant change in my life was my current obsession with hypergeometry that would distract me away from any remaining chance of rekindling my relationship with Beverly.

I can think of no greater folly than to neglect a chance for love, in order to follow a chance for money, or fame. That is the classic Scrooge mistake, to value money and things over people. But this bit of wisdom I learned the hard way. There is no excuse for it. This was 20 years before the Internet, and my worldview then was that long-distance relationships do not last. I therefore considered my romance with Beverly doomed, since in my present circumstances I would see her even less often than before. Unlike my father, who had met my mother in his senior year and married her 8 months later, I met Beverly in my Youngster (sophomore) year at USNA. There would have been a minimum of two more years before we could have been married, and now that I had resigned from USNA and moved back south to Gainesville, I had no idea when I would graduate, have a decent job, and be able to pull off supporting a wife and starting a family.

Beverly Ann of Philadelphia, this is my open apology to you before the world. I have tried to tell myself that my distraction was understandable, but I keep coming around to the fact that one real love is worth a thousand inventions. Confronted with the Mysterious, I wandered away into the world of people and ideas and technology. I hope you had and have a wonderful life without me, for you always deserved the best. If this binary message in a bottle reaches you, I wish I could assure you that the fault was all mine, that I did not miss out on the great adventure of your life because I found you lacking; quite the contrary — you deserved a better man than I was then. I know that in some of the time lines in the Multiverse you and I did marry and have children. Maybe some of them had my eyes and your smile, or vice versa.
.
me in 2000
Here is the folding pattern that started it all. I realized that I wanted to make an inside-out model of a tesseract. The cube-within-a-cube could be seen as one of two ways to view the 4D geometry from the perspective of 3-space.

In one version, the usual perspective, a tiny cube is apparently “inside” a larger cube and the corresponding corners are connected by inward-pointing lines that make every point the juncture of 4 edges, just as all corners of an ordinary 3D cube are the junctures of 3 edges.

me in 2000In the other version the inner cube seems to have been pulled apart. The inward-pointing truncated pyramids (whose square tops came together to make the little cube apparently floating at the center of the large outer cube) are now pointing away from the larger cube. Each of the six truncated pyramids points by itself from a face of the large cube outwards along one of the +x. -x, +y, -y, +z, and -z directions. The little inner cube has thus become the six little outer squares  at the tops of the outward-pointing pyramids.

I had been making and contemplating these cardboard models since before the Spring quarter ended. I had sometimes referred to them as “tunnel crystals”, since meditation (which I had taught myself at USNA using Benson’s The Relaxation Response) often allowed the visual illusion that the shape had folded back in on itself and the outward-pointing pyramids had become, instead, corridors leading to the center of the tesseract, dwindling in cross section because of parallax perspective.

folding pattern

.

I had shown this peculiar inside-out shape to my friend Thomas Weiss. He was immediately struck by its unique symmetry, and simplified the design by extending the sub-pyramids to points instead of truncating them. This eliminates all the little squares in the folding pattern and makes it much simpler. Now it consists only of twelve rhombi. When they come together you get a shape known as the Rhombic Dodecahedron. It was known to Kepler (who had a positive fetish for nested crystalline geometries, who had seen the peculiarity that you can slice a cube apart into pyramids, turn them around, and re-assemble them to form a rhombic dodecahedron with the points on the outside and a cube-shaped empty hollow in the middle.

.

me in 2000

Here is a picture taken of me holding a miniature wooden Rhombic Dodecahedron. Tom and I had never seen this shape before. Now we saw it everywhere we looked. It is a shape that appears in the crystals of Copper, Magnetite, Lapis Lazuli, and a chemical used to sterilize swimming pools. Matter uses geometry; since this is a fairly simple and symmetrical geometry we ought to find it represented in nature, and we do.

After long argument, many now accept that honeybees use a stretched form of this as the basic cell of the honeycomb. We might think the honeycomb is made of mere hexagonal cylinders. But it surns out that when you make a layer of them on one side and another layer butting up against them on the other side, the ends of the comb cells where they bump into the ends of the other cells meet in three rhombi — there may be a flat or hemispherical cap on the access end of these wax food/egg storage modules, but where their bottoms butt together it is more space- and wax-efficient for them to close-pack with Rhombic Dodecahedra.  So they do. Yes, that’s right. Honeybees, mere insects with only a million brain cells, can not only find nectar-bearing flowers and return to give directions to the food to their fellow bees, but they also, as bees, secrete some of the carbs they ingest as wax. And they are programmed to use this wax to make stretched rhombic dodecahedra, which make perfect unit cells for a close-packing space-filling wax-efficient design. Nature uses what works, and necessity streamlines the design to find the moist efficient incarnation.

At the end of the Spring quarter my brother James and I left our dorm room at Reid Cop-op and applied for and received jobs in the Magic Kingdom. it was time to try working for a living, and we tried it in the wonderful wacky world of Walt Disney World.

We thought as college students we might find some kind of internship or reasonably decent temporary positions. What we were offered and accepted was positions as Custodial Hosts. All workers at Disney World  are reminded to think of themselves as Hosts, and the customers as Guests. So we were NOT janitors, darn it, any more than the young people in airliners were stews any more, but were now to be called “Flight Attendants”. NO, of course not. We were Custodial Hosts rather than janitors, we served Guests rather than customers, and we wore Costumes rather than uniforms. I’m serious. I work a work uniform that consisted of a khaki shirt and dark pants, but I resported to Costuming to pick up laundered replacement. And I had been hired in a building that was NOT the Personnel or Employment office — it was, we were reminded seriously, known as Central Casting, as if we were being given roles in a Disney movie instead of applying for jobs cleaning and maintaining the theme park.

My brother James and I had received positions as Graveyard Shift Custodial Hosts. This meant an extra 25 cents “shift differential”, meaning that instead of the minimum wage of $2.35 per hour we would be receiving the staggering sum of $2.60 per hour. We found an inexpensive apartment in Orlando and moved in.

This was another strange summer. The summer before, I had learned about naval guns near Virginia Beach, flown back seat in a T-28 Trojan (not making this up!) training jet, nearly drowned upside-down in the Dilbert Dunker in Pensacola (has nothing to do with the cartoon techie by the same name), wandered through the bushes of Quantico with an M16, and gone underwater from New London, CT in a nuclear Attack sub.

That had been eventful. This summer was different. Star Wars played at the same local multiplex all summer, and my brother and I went to see it like 5 times.

Shortly after we began working at WDW, James and I drove our ancient gray 1966 Dodge Dart over to Gainesville to see how Tom and his brother Rob were doing there. There we discovered that Tom had found a practical use for the geometry. He had emphatically suggested the shape’s utility as a loudspeaker cabinet, and when his father poo-poohed the idea Tom went ahead and build a prototype. It worked even better than Tom had expected, astounding his father, who among other things had been an amateur loudspeaker builder in his past. He and Tom could hear right away that the woofer they mounted on the shape was putting out purer and fuller sound than a normal implementation.

It looked like we had found something useful and important. Tom informed me of his discovery, as I had showed him my cardboard models, and we began making plans to apply for a United States Utility patent. This would not be mere “design” patent, like a novel shape for a door knob. It would be a utility patent, and add to mankind’s catalog of useful and improved technological geometries like the lens and the parabolic dish.

Next: Blue Skies and Radial Arm Saws in 1978: the first attempt to mass-manufacture hypercubes.

–MRK

Twitter del.icio.us Digg Facebook linked-in Yahoo Buzz StumbleUpon

I Demand My Imaginary Rights As A Quasi-Citizen!

February 10th, 2012

snapshotI cannot believe that the Bill of Rights is only a pile of sand castles, to be swept away on a wave of paranoia.

We’ve been afraid before. We’ve been hurt before. Attacked without warning. We’ve been tempted to treat those sacred words as mere abstractions, as if they were the vague ramblings and daydreams of quaint naive  optimists from an obsolete era.

Are we going to allow the trend to continue this time? We’ve turned it back before. Maybe it’s never gotten this bad before. But we’ve remembered ourselves each time and tried to learn from our mistakes.

Do we truly believe that we can protect the Constitution OR the People, but not both? Shall we protect civilization by destroying its basis, the fundamental rules protecting our rights and freedoms? Shall we do away with freedom of Speech, because some people might actually complain? Shall we turn unified police and military forces on people who still believe that they can stand on the sidewalk and peacefully protest against how the rich have bought the government?

The NDAA was passed and Obama signed it. One part of it allows the government to use military personnel to arrest anyone in the United States. For the first time, they can order some Marines to kidnap you, then hold you in a military prison indefinitely. Since it is difficult for people to prove a negative, i.e., that they are NOT terrorists engaged in operations against the U.S., this creates a legal excuse to use the military to arrest protesters, malcontents, social critics, and political opponents.

What this means, fellow humans, is that in the United States, there is now, effectively, no longer and real freedom of speech (you can be arrested if they don’t like what you say, unlike a year ago),  freedom of assembly (you are a mob and will be dispersed by any means necessary), or right to due process (sorry, I am a marine, and I didn’t need a search warrant because I am not a policeman, I am a soldier).

Whether or not you know it or admit it, if you WERE a citizen you are now only a QUASI-citizen. There is still, after all, the Postal System and you will be allowed to vote…for one of the approved candidates.

I will not admit that my rights are gone. They were ALWAYS imaginary, from the first, but that did not stop us from building a great nation around them. I will not relinquish them. They are part of what we were, what I still am. Who is still with me?

I DEMAND MY IMAGINARY RIGHTS AS A QUASI-CITIZEN!

—MRK

Locations of Site Visitors

Twitter del.icio.us Digg Facebook linked-in Yahoo Buzz StumbleUpon